Public
below my comment appeared on the blog of 'The Unit 17/07 / 2009 ( http://cittaecitta.blog.unita.it//Le_due_scelte_di_Salerno_491.shtml ) reported on the Committee website and no Crescent ( www.nocrescent.it )
drying clothes WHERE THE CONDOMINIUMS CRESCENT?
About the project:
First, the controversy on the actual size speaks volumes about the transparency of the project and its successful transmission of nationality. Any action of waterfront, including the tables of the competition produced by amateurs or emerging architecture is accompanied by an extensive series of fotorendering. This is primarily a form of study and preliminary environmental impact assessment on the part of the architectural designer, as well as a modern and effective tool for reporting and dissemination of the work, its more easily understood, even by less experienced . In the case of the Crescent fotoinserimento three-dimensional, or at least the prospectus with the inclusion of buildings overlooking the sea curtain in order to compare the heights, has never been made public, but for sure because there is no doubt that the study has been carried out for Bofill reasons set out above and submit documentation to the Department. E 'state is shown with great fanfare but the model has the essential function of defining and highlighting the volume and architecture of the individual, but not his actual relationship with the context. It would be appropriate to have seen at eye level, inside the square and at strategic points (the cornerstones of the iconography of the city) such as the waterfront, as seen from the sea looking towards the hill and the Castle of Buonadies Arechi.
Where are the official rendering of the Crescent Bofill made by the study and presented the request for an opinion to the Department? Where is the environmental impact study of the Crescent on the seafront of Salerno?
On-gap project name and not only that
It advertises the creation of a vacuum, a large square: Piazza della Libertà , in reality it will build a mammoth volume, full of cement as Crescent. It misleads the public by presenting as a public open space and what will be a building, a private building nearly 30 meters high.
identity:
Salerno is not Naples, or Rome, or Lisbon, and then did not need a second square of the Plebiscite, a second Piazza del Popolo, etc.. If Salerno had not ever get an identity not by copying other cities, other models. Who says Salerno lack of identity, he just can not see it. There is an error cultural background, the Crescent will be the most beautiful building in the world (obviously not with the current form) designed by the most acclaimed of the moment (obviously not the current one) but would incorrectly attempt to emulation of reality different from ours. It 'obvious that the culture of the project, the sensitivity to the environment and the landscape, knowledge of the real potential of our village, not only exploited but let wither and agony, are not at home nor find a home in Salerno Crescent .
On beauty:
It appeals to the excessive volume, at huge, the barrier between the coast and the city, the type obsolete, etc. .. The aesthetics do not argue, we know that is subjective and debatable. The beautiful object does not exist ... but the objective is ugly! and then we have the courage to say it clearly: the Crescent is objectively bad.
In the end (but not too much to defuse):
Where drying clothes condos at the Crescent, from the balconies overlooking the largest square in Europe? Or all of the apartments will be equipped with a dryer? but we know our parts not in use. When the Festivalbar be snatched Plebiscite Square, hosted at Freedom Square will like to rest the poor millionaires living in the crescent condominiums with all those decibels?
0 comments:
Post a Comment