Can Wife Breastfeed Her Husband

breeding and slaughter in Islam

Halal slaughter methods
DEBATE ON THE 'HALAL': animal rights protect the sheep or the butcher?
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
attacks against the Islamic method of slaughter 'Halal' by animal rights activists, telling the "story" of a barbaric and bloody ritual slaughter, are constantly increasing.
There are two different aspects of this controversy: the program of vegetarians, who would totally prohibit the consumption of animal products, and animal rights lobby, which is the mouthpiece of the request for a more humane method of slaughter.
ANIMALS HAVE RIGHTS?
The argument raised by vegetarians supports that killing animals for human benefit is that it is cruel and a violation of their rights. According to their point of view, men and animals are on the same level without recognizing the human being any kind of authority over them. This reasoning is totally wrong because if the animals had rights comparable to those of man, should have, then, also equivalent duties, in other words we should be able to accuse and punish them when they violate the rights of others.
It 's absurd to be considered a crime if a human kills a sheep, while considered "normal" if a lion to do so. The problem stems from the idea of \u200b\u200bman's role wrong within the animal kingdom: the denial of the purpose of creating a hierarchy within delineated with precision degrades man to the same level as other creatures.
But in this case, the reasoning is illogical, because then the plants will not be granted the same protection against the violation of the sanctity of their lives?
ISLAMIC SLAUGHTER AND THE METHOD OF 'CRUEL?
a different view about the method of slaughter to be used to avoid any kind of cruelty.
It 'true that when the blood flows from the throat of an animal scene that presents itself to our eyes looks pretty violent, but the fact that a day today's meat is purchased in supermarkets, in clean and hygienic packaging, does not mean that the animal had to die!
methods that compel non-Muslims slaughter the animal is not conscious before his killing and this is usually achieved through stunning ol'elettronarcosi. It 'really less painful to shoot a pistol in the brain of a sheep or put a ring on the neck of a chicken, which affect his throat? Simply watch the scene can not give us an objective idea of \u200b\u200bwhat the animal test.
scientific facts
team at the University of Hannover in Germany examined the two methods by analyzing the recordings produced dall'elettroencefalogramma (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG). In all animals used for the experiment were surgically implanted electrodes in a number of different parts of the skull, after which these animals were given several weeks to recover.
Later some of them were slaughtered by the method Islamic 'halal', meaning a rapid, deep incision on the neck from side to side, made a very sharp blade, which cuts the jugular vein el 'carotid artery together with the trachea and esophagus, but leaves intact the spine.
The rest of the cattle before being slaughtered is giddy with the method of captive bolt pistol, typical of Western slaughterhouses.
EEG and ECG recordings allowed the observation of the brain and heart throughout the process.
HALAL METHOD
The method 'halal' is not registered no change in the EEG graph for the first 3 seconds of the incision, indicating that the animal did not feel any pain due to the cut. This is not surprising: often, when we cut with a sharp tool, we realize it only after some 'time! The following 3 seconds
showed a condition similar to a state of unconsciousness of deep sleep caused the loss of huge amounts of blood. From that moment on, the EEG has reported zero values \u200b\u200bindicate that a total absence of pain, although the heart was still beating and the body was in the grip of severe seizures, a conditioned reflex of the spine. And
'This is the phase most unpleasant for caregivers, who mistakenly convinced that the animal is suffering while his brain actually does not record any more sensory message.
METHOD
WESTERN with the Western method, the animals were apparently unconscious after stunning, and this method of killing seems to be to the observer, much more peaceful. Nevertheless, the reading
EEG showed severe pain immediately after stunning. While in the first instance the animal begins to feel pain because of the "hunger" of oxygen and blood in the brain - the brain has died, to put it in simple terms - the second example of the first slaughter causes the arrest of the heart, while the animal is still capable of feeling pain.
there is not, however, unpleasant to convulsions, which not only means there is more blood retention in the flesh, but also that this second method lends itself much better to question the efficiency of modern methods of mass slaughter. When an animal is not moving is much easier to kill him on the conveyor belt!
The Closet
What we see is not always reality. Those who want to ban the Islamic way, by appealing to a more humane way to kill animals necessary to our livelihood, they are actually more concerned about people's feelings and those of animals, which would have you believe to be in favor. The method of stunning
makes the mass slaughter of easier and more acceptable to consumers, who can deceive himself that the animal did not feel any pain when he goes to buy his piece of meat, clean and Shipping, the supermarket.
Method 'Halal', in contrast, does not seek to deny that the consumption of meat means that animals have to die, but is executed so as to cause the least pain possible. THE HOLISTIC VIEW

Islam is a way of life balanced. For Muslims the privilege to supplement their diet with animal protein indicates a duty towards the welfare of the animal itself, both during the breeding during the slaughter.
Modern methods of breeding and slaughter Westerners, on the contrary, pointing to a mass consumer market and treat the animal as a commodity. As the battery hens are more suitable for producing large scale quantities of eggs, the methods of slaughter Westerners are better for the industry meat, but are not favorable or animal, or the consumer.
The Islamic model ensures a healthier life for the animal and meat is healthier for the consumer.
Sahib Mustaqim Bleher was born in Germany to a Protestant family. He made a career in journalism and book publishing. He converted to Islam in 1980 and later moved to England. Currently holds the post of Secretary General of the British Islamic Party (Islamic Party of Britain).

taken from http://www.huda.it

One-piece Swimsuit Wallpaper

why you should not eat pork in Islam

Pork
by Mostafa A. Refaei
In the Name of Allah, the Merciful, the most merciful
Another example of those who allow themselves to express opinions without the slightest awareness of the saying of Allah: {Say: 'In what is revealed to me I find no other prohibitions about food, if not' dead animal, blood poured out and the pork - which is unclean. "} [Surat Al-An'am (The Cattle), vers. No 145]. They say that such a ban, according to them, concerned that time of the pig, who was accustomed to eating from garbage and feces, and this is not applicable to the pig of our times that is raised under sanitary control! [1]
They want to divert Qur'an a second time during certain periods in their complacent, but the will One who is blessed and glorious, who has sent down is to make books of all time.

[1] From "Divine Verses - the miracle of the Qur'an": pp. 227-229: "The prohibition of eating pork - pork Having alluded to, you can not avoid talking about it. More or less everyone knows that Muslims do not eat meat because the Qur'an (2:173, 5:3; 6:145, 16:115) forbids man to eat. Often, this ban has been the subject of mockery in the mouths of non-Muslims. Now, however, the framework is food, even scientifically, many funds: So it's Because the Muslims are right to take against those who still eat it.
But let's see why. Our limited human knowledge only recently been able to discover the many damages that pork can make in the human body. Besides the fact that the pig is not only a herbivore carnivore but also, it contains a third peculiarity very disgusting food: it is, indeed, as noted also iatrochemists Paracelsus, an eater of dung! In fact, in many places in the world where there are no sewage systems that animal was and is still used, in fact, as a cleaner.
turns out to be - for those who always reflected - the question of good taste and high culture do not swallow the meat of a beast so hideous and disgusting: we need to say anything but "Enjoy!" when you consume meals of pork!
Pork, moreover, has malfunctioning kidneys. That is to say, unlike us humans or animals in general, its filtration system is physical constitution, in a certain way, sick or to put it more exactly, there is little operational: we are able to clean up the Our body is approximately 94% of uric acid through our kidneys and through urine, so also all the common animals. The pig, however, fails to expel the exception of about 4-5%. And the rest? The remains of course in the physical; we must not, in fact, surprised his fatten fast: it is much of what he had to finish in his urine! Uric acid (like other substances in urine), it is well known, is a dangerous poison, the vehicle of many diseases.
By then using the field of parasitology and microbiology than is demonstrated by yet another angle, such as pork contains high levels of pathogens that pose a considerable risk of disease.
This animal has in common with the man three treacherous guests: Balantidium coli, taenia solium and Trichinella. What would they be? We'll say it now:
1. The Balantidium coli, is a parasite that lives in the intestine large intestine. Its incidence is 21% pork, and 1% in humans. From pig to man through the food chain. The presence of this protozoan parasite causes diarrhea accompanied by severe pain in the abdomen, and can even be lethal.
2. The taenia solium (= the "tapeworm") is another parasite that dwells in the pig, from which it passes to humans. The incidence of human infestation by the pig varies from area to area. Some millions of men, however, are infected with this worm very reliable according to a report issued by an authoritative parasitologist. It is well known how difficult it is to cure those who are infested. The removal of this worm is indeed very difficult.
3. Trichinosis is another worm that, in turn, is hidden in muscle fibers of the pig. If the infested meat is ingested, trichinosis is installed in the small intestine of man, where reproduction takes place, and it is through the bloodstream to the larvae - 1500 per female - invade the whole body (muscles, skeleton, brain, bone marrow, retina and lungs). Its presence in the physical causes symptoms that are very similar to those produced by a specific fifty diseases, the diagnosis is therefore very difficult. Trichinosis, which is the name of the disease caused by this worm breaks out in epidemic form.
Another guest of the pig is the Erysipelothrix rhusiopathia. It is the pathogenic factor of acute or chronic erysipelas. That is acute, mainly consisting of high fever accompanied by a marked decrease in activity and appetite. As chronic, however, produces a diamond-shaped scales that affect the heart valves, and may cause the alteration of the functioning of the heart and also led to sudden death. The Erysipelothrix rhusiopathia is present in the body by about 30% of the pigs healthy and can survive for a long time even in its dried meat.
Among other damage inflicted by the pig include the following disorders: hemoptysis endemic, brucellosis, jaundice, intestinal obstruction, acute pancreatitis, anemia, and so on. In reality, there is no other animal food traditions among those included in the outside of the standard (dogs, cats, snails, frogs, etc..) Bearer of such a high potential for adverse effects to human health because the pig.
Notice how none of the formulations reported here proves the Koran in opposition with the data of modern knowledge, nor with anything that might reasonably arise therefrom. "

taken from http://www.huda.it

Zig Zag Comparison To A Swisher

power in school canteens and osteonecrosis

here Following an article by Dr.. Andrea Bolognesi,
who collaborated with the Municipality of Prato, as an expert in natural food
in tendering for school meals

The time of meal
With the reopening of schools persists, as every year, the issue of school meals and, more generally, in power ' childhood.
It 's a matter of considerable importance that, strangely, no one speaks.
just taking one thousandth of the time and pages allocated to the controversy on the crucifix in classrooms or on the question of the weight of backpacks, to do more practical work and social life.
all know now how close the relation between the onset of major diseases that afflict our age and some unfair or inappropriate behavior food. We also know that, in this last century have radically changed these habits in the countries of the so-called "civilized".
industrial technologies have gradually penetrated the food and, on one hand improved the preservation and hygiene of food, the other has irretrievably upset the balance inherent in nutrients such as Nature had given them to us for thousands years.
To support this strategy has succeeded, more and more overwhelming publicity, totally conditioned that the eating habits of most people. Well
alliance between these two powers (well established by the god Profit), resulted in the greatest threat to health history human memories.
pollution more subtle and more deadly. Without disturbing
striking and now historical episodes such as wine or tomatoes temik methanol or the latest "mad cow disease", just dwell on only two aspects, say newspapers, and therefore more dangerous, supply current, particularly important for children: sugar and refined foods in general.
Sugar is the prototype of the "food" is fine as the remnants of the working of cane or beet, which are removed all the vitamins and minerals to get to the product "pure sucrose.
There is more food in kind unbalanced: it is for those who ingests a "metabolic bomb" that forces the body to mobilize the adrenal glands, pancreas, and consume the B vitamins and calcium, to be able to dispose of it. You can not even consider it a food, but simply a bearer of "empty calories", an end in itself, unrelated to the needs of an organization in search of balance.
The dramatic rise of sugar consumption occurred in the last century (in Italy by 3 kg. Per capita in 1881 grew to 28.1 in 1984), goes hand in hand with the increase of degenerative diseases (diabetes, atherosclerosis , cancer, etc. ..) that have replaced the role of infectious killer of the twentieth century.
Official medical science began timidly to admit (as is now overwhelming evidence) the liability of sugar in Acarie decay and obesity, other scourges of the affluent society.
environment of Natural Medicine, where I work, are known in fact many other, broader responsibilities, as documented by the enemy of health.
Much the same is to be done to refined grains, in which no more than 90% of their nutritional value, their vitality, their admirable balance of vitamins, amino acids, minerals, trace elements, which for millennia has been the backbone of ' Food. Operations such as
refining, bleaching and shine the rice, reduce the wheat flour to make 00 for a loaf of bread that has only the name and then "steer" people, obviously constipated and / or colicky, to buy the bran (previously removed!) in pharmacy or herbal products at very high prices or the biscuits "enriched" with vitamins and calcium and phosphorus (previously removed!), they really think that the state, dominated by the multinationals, has little interest in public health, and indeed it takes action to undermine it.
These are just small examples of the absurdity, or rather "complicated simplicity" for profit, which the logic of modern forces us, we could go and find examples as meaningful in any food business. Despite such evidence
conquer the evil custom of feeding the children with sweets, snacks, soft drinks and the school becomes a "partner" as a place often chosen, with wicked cunning, advertising for the trafficking of these "junk foods", which not would propose, knowing well, our worst enemy.
There is nothing more destructive of these "foods" to children's health. Cocktails are devastating (studied by experts at the table) of refined sugars, dyes, preservatives, milk powder, fats, refined flours, which have nothing of genuine, despite the brazenly proclaim different advertising spots.
In addition the use of these products and morally harmful because the child away from the natural flavors of truly wholesome foods, fruits, fresh vegetables and wholemeal bread, etc. .. Some time ago an advertisement appeared even inviting the mothers to put in your two cakes instead of bread and butter is considered "heavy" to give more energy to their children and, in another scene, a boy said to another, during the interval, a sentence like: "But the great thing about school is that there is an interval, so we can eat our snacks."
Examples of such monstrosities which still continue in other forms, should be reported or not buying at least boycotted. Something similar happened a few years ago with the blow that cover the city with the words: "Sugar is good for the brain" - "Your body needs sugar. Never lies and deception were more serious because assimilate the sugars, complex carbohydrates understood as necessary for man to that of refined sugar-sucrose which has nothing to do with the human metabolic balance and energy needs of the brain .
Returning to school meals for some years a regional law
requires the inclusion of organic food and traditional food in school meals and so some attempt is being done, but there are still many obstacles, especially for the hostility of the parents of the children, stubbornly clinging to certain biases (such as meat every day, the meal with first, second, and fresh fruit, etc. ..) and the lack of knowledge and sensitivity of the teaching staff, things that I have witnessed directly participating as a consultant Comune di Prato for school meals.
How then to defend themselves?
Here are some suggestions:
1) ELIMINATE refined sugar in all its forms, visible or hidden (it is ubiquitous in the labels!), Buy only products where it is expressly written without sugar or, alternatively, where there are natural sweeteners like honey, malt, molasses, etc. ..
2) Replace refined grains (bread, pasta, rice, flour, etc. ..) with those integrals, possibly in organic farming.
3) boycott all industrial products advertised and sold for children, on the assumption that genuine and not a harmful product is inversely proportional to the manufacturer's advertising budget.
4) Go back to the traditional food of our land and seasons and to accustom the children to eat fruit, vegetables, legumes, whole grain bread.
5) limiting the use of television in children, especially advertising.
6) Outreach to schools to the problem of school lunch menus which are not (like those of the hospitals on which we would have to write another article) example of healthy power. Spend more time in meetings with parents to discuss these problems and operational decisions on the type expel from the school vending machines dispensing of snacks, Coca Cola and the like.
Finally remember that the people who have kept primitive habits and appropriate to their own traditions and have healthy teeth are very healthy, as they had more than a century ago, the indigenous sugar cane cutters, who used to chew, while their masters and colonizers who used refined sugar started to have rotten teeth and a thousand other ills. And do not believe those who tell you that in civilized countries mortality has declined and the other is still very high because if the planet's resources were better distributed between North and South would not be so. Dr. Andrea Bolognesi

Current Emphysema Treatment

TriviArt Revealed! Art Trivia

Hello everyone, I finally find

some time to unravel the quiz now place two weeks ago. The photos I had brought the painting showed a particular "The Three Graces" of Pieter Paul Rubens , Flemish painter who lived between 1500 and 1600.

The detail that I showed you is nothing but a garland of flowers placed over the heads of the three dancing Graces. Although it is a very small part of the picture, the picture was perfectly readable and indeed, one could perfectly well appreciate the little bee on a flower drawn.
To capture this particular matter does not go to the Prado scale and fitted with a camera, waiting the right light to take the picture! Just go to Google maps or Google Earth and look for the museum.

The popular search engine is in fact waging a campaign scanning the most important works of the Prado to offer them the widest possible dissemination, digital images were acquired at very high resolution have a definition of about 14,000 million pixels!

Digital copies made on-line permit, therefore, not only an enjoyable unprecedented image (no blurs or abrupt transitions between one color to another), but also a clarity of detail almost better than to eye naked so you can appreciate the little bee on the flowers in "The Three Graces' by Rubens, or tears on the faces of the" Crucifixion "by Juan de Flanders.
also add the video released by Google that shows all stages of the project.



As shown in the video, Google Earth, enabling the label "3D Buildings", you can also "visit" the building of the Prado: it is a first step to the "online travel"?

course, see the works live them live fully in the place where they are stored, is not comparable to the simple vision of a copy digital, but that will anyone, even those who can not go to the Prado in person (for economic reasons, distance or for any other reason) may have access to cultural heritage that these works represent. And this is beautiful.

Andrea