Hello,
It is now a few months ago news that the Minister of Heritage and Culture, Sandro Bondi, would create a new figure in the cultural heritage: the "Director General for the development of museums."
In projects Minister that person would have among its duties, the 'permission to all loans for exhibitions, the decision on what the exhibition of "significant cultural, scientific research programs on the museum's holdings and, finally," the criteria for 'reliance on loan or deposit of goods or property by museums. "
We now know that it was actually taken a step back on the creation of this new figure (now called the "Director General of Museums") and especially the powers referred to it, is still interesting, in our opinion, talk about this and we would like to know your opinions.
The plans of the Minister, of course, Such a solution would help the ministry to boost the coffers and now wan to manage in a more simple (but also more authoritarian) all the various operations in the world of art, such as loans, exhibitions and acquisitions. This view is confirmed by the person who is going to hold this office: Mario Resca , business person of undoubted quality, but never had to do with the Cultural Heritage or works of art in general.
While it is important to be able to "value" their cultural heritage, it is essential to interpret that "exploitation" as the ability to allow anyone to take advantage of this wealth. No coincidence that many Italian sites are the property of 'UNESCO, or the heritage of' humanity.
The new manager should assist in ensuring the widest possible enjoyment and easily by everyone, not to mere financial speculation in the works for "make money".
The problem of recovery of funds for cultural heritage must surely be addressed, even the huge "turtle" bureaucratic, affecting most areas in Italy, must be fought by all means.
The "Director General of Museums" is the answer? It is not likely to have an overly "Economist" (Pass me the term) of cultural heritage, relegating works or places that are in fact pregnant with meaning, history and morality to mere objects of sale? It is not likely
perhaps a gradual shift in conservation efforts (and investment) to those sites "known" to those places, that is, allowing a greater monetary return, to the detriment of the sites (and works) "minor"?
We have launched our pebble in the pond ... waiting for your answers!
Andrea
It is now a few months ago news that the Minister of Heritage and Culture, Sandro Bondi, would create a new figure in the cultural heritage: the "Director General for the development of museums."
In projects Minister that person would have among its duties, the 'permission to all loans for exhibitions, the decision on what the exhibition of "significant cultural, scientific research programs on the museum's holdings and, finally," the criteria for 'reliance on loan or deposit of goods or property by museums. "
We now know that it was actually taken a step back on the creation of this new figure (now called the "Director General of Museums") and especially the powers referred to it, is still interesting, in our opinion, talk about this and we would like to know your opinions.
The plans of the Minister, of course, Such a solution would help the ministry to boost the coffers and now wan to manage in a more simple (but also more authoritarian) all the various operations in the world of art, such as loans, exhibitions and acquisitions. This view is confirmed by the person who is going to hold this office: Mario Resca , business person of undoubted quality, but never had to do with the Cultural Heritage or works of art in general.
While it is important to be able to "value" their cultural heritage, it is essential to interpret that "exploitation" as the ability to allow anyone to take advantage of this wealth. No coincidence that many Italian sites are the property of 'UNESCO, or the heritage of' humanity.
The new manager should assist in ensuring the widest possible enjoyment and easily by everyone, not to mere financial speculation in the works for "make money".
The problem of recovery of funds for cultural heritage must surely be addressed, even the huge "turtle" bureaucratic, affecting most areas in Italy, must be fought by all means.
The "Director General of Museums" is the answer? It is not likely to have an overly "Economist" (Pass me the term) of cultural heritage, relegating works or places that are in fact pregnant with meaning, history and morality to mere objects of sale? It is not likely
perhaps a gradual shift in conservation efforts (and investment) to those sites "known" to those places, that is, allowing a greater monetary return, to the detriment of the sites (and works) "minor"?
We have launched our pebble in the pond ... waiting for your answers!
Andrea
0 comments:
Post a Comment